Talk:List of law enforcement agencies in Nebraska

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Merger

Should these pages be merged?
Should they be merged to Law enforcement in Nebraska?
Should they be merged here, instead?

Discuss, reach consensus, and enact. Note that even editors without accounts have all of the tools necessary to enact this (once the merge target exists). It doesn't require an administrator. Even creating a new article for the merge target only requires an account. Uncle G (talk) 10:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personally don't see the value on any merge as there is nothing of any encyclopaedic value to merge on the vast majority of these (exception of Friend Police Department (Nebraska) ) - there is already a List of law enforcement agencies in Nebraska. Codf1977 (talk) 10:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- … which contains a whole load of redlinks, that can also be dealt with, using ordinary editing tools, as part of the overall discussion. Have you noticed what article's talk page the discussion link brought you to? ☺ Uncle G (talk) 10:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, I think, remove the red links and delete the stubs and put the bit from the Friend Police Department (Nebraska) on this page. Codf1977 (talk) 11:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- - I agree with Codf. Delete, not merge. Enigma^msg 00:31, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]