Jump to content

Talk:List of maritime patrol aircraft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.airbusmilitary.com/Surveillance.aspx
    Triggered by \bairbusmilitary\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Number built

[edit]

The standard format at WP:AVILIST for lists of aircraft by role does not include the number of each type built. If the number built is to be included here, it requires either a consensus here that maritime patrol aircraft are a special case, or a change to the consensus over lists by role, at the avilist talk page. Until either of these consensus changes happens, these numbers do not belong here. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 13:20, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually all military aircraft have different table rules2601:405:4301:CB3F:EC51:F42E:F78D:B7B9 (talk) 04:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where are these different table rules to be found? I can see no approriate topic listed in the MILHIST subpages. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:35, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a discussion on this topic on the style guide talk page. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you look further up that same page under Style guide/Lists#No. a consensus was made to standardize on Total. - NiD.29 (talk) 22:43, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To avoid splitting this discussion, I am replying to your comment in the main discussion which I just linked to, — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 07:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of maritime patrol aircraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]