Talk:List of mathematic operators

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grouping[edit]

Dont know how to group the entries better: by properties (i.e. linearity) or by branch of mathematics where they are used.--Planemo 17:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Evolute polar[edit]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:List of mathematic operators/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Scope needs to be clearly defined; symbols must be defined for equations to be readable; more prose to accompany eqiuations; consider splitting table up under section headings. Tompw (talk) 17:52, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 23:30, 19 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Regarding the adjective "mathematic"[edit]

I suggest changing the title of this article to "List of mathematical operators" instead of the current choice of wording. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:6B0:1:1041:8855:A3EF:3710:F9CB (talk) 04:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a list of mathematical operators[edit]

This is a list of operators in field theory. It lacks all the set operators, logical operators, meta-logical operators, the mapping operators, the relational operators, the geometric operators, and the tensor operators that would be needed to make this a list of mathematical operators per se. Many (but not all) of the symbols for the missing operators are in the List of Mathematical Symbols. (If anyone cares to argue that some of the missing operators are relations rather than operators, note that they fit the definition for "operator" because they all map an expression that uses any of these operators to the logical space.) --Kikilamb (talk) 17:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]