Talk:List of nearest exoplanets

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of nearest exoplanets article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

List of nearest exoplanets is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 19, 2014	Peer review	Reviewed
September 1, 2014	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
March 30, 2015	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
May 29, 2016	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
May 20, 2018	Featured list candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured list

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Lacaille 9352b, Lacaille 9352c[edit]

Minimum masses need an update Lacaille 9352(4.2 , 7.6).--92.152.199.96 (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of Proxima c[edit]

Given this recent study, I recently removed the entry for Proxima Centauri c from this list, with a note "one disputed candidate (c)". User:Italyoz484 added the entry back without comment. I think it should remain a note rather than a list entry unless it's more clearly confirmed.

On a similar note, should planets that only appear in Tuomi et al. 2019 (e.g. Wolf 359 bc) be included here? The paper was never published in a journal, and about as many planets from it have been disproven as confirmed by follow-up studies. SevenSpheres (talk) 14:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]