Talk:List of snakes of Trinidad and Tobago

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of snakes of Trinidad and Tobago is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on August 27, 2012.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 26, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
June 30, 2005Featured list candidatePromoted
September 26, 2009Featured list removal candidateKept
Current status: Featured list

Comments[edit]

I've had a go at a new format, bringing the notes into the table. See what you think. OpenToppedBus - Talk June 28, 2005 08:56 (UTC)

Family Boidae[edit]

Species Common name Location Notes
Boa constrictor constrictor Macajuel, Boa Constrictor Trinidad, Tobago, Bocas Recorded on the islands of Monos and Gaspar Grande in the Bocas
Corallus ruschenbergerii Cascabel Dormillon; Cook's Tree Boa Trinidad, Tobago
Epicrates cenchria maurus Rainbow Boa Trinidad, Tobago, Bocas Reported from the island of Chacachacare in the Bocas, but has not been confirmed with a collection
Eunectes murinas gigas Huille, Anaconda Trinidad

Comments raised at TFL[edit]

Comments: Almost ready to go. Personally I would like to see more prose and a clearer image or even more images, but that is not essential. Some minor issues follow...

  • Intro has some short paragraphs which could be merged or expanded (e.g. with information on how common these snakes are on T and T or whether there are any endemic snakes...)
  • "sp." and "spp." should be explained somehow (in a footnote or so).
  • I understand referencing the cells with "yes", but why referencing the species name (sometimes and not always)?
  • Jargon "monotypic" could be explained shortly in prose.
  • Possibly "...three Subfamily..." -> "...three subfamilies..."!?
  • There is no intro for the "Subfamily Dipsadinae" section.
  • Note 34 is unreferenced
  • Possibly "...found all over the world, except in..."-> "...found all over the world, except for..."!?
  • In the "Family Colubridae" section, possibly "...are found on Trinidad and Tobago." -> "...are found in Trinidad and Tobago." (since the country is meant here). Same for the "Family Elapidae" and "Family Viperidae" sections.

bamse (talk) 16:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have merged and expanded the paragraphs in the lede, explained "sp." and "spp." in a footnote, removed referencing from species names, explained the word "monotypic" in prose, reworded "three Subfamily" to "three subfamilies," added an introduction to the "Subfamily Dipsadinae" section, reworded "found all over the world, except in" to "found all over the world, except for" in all three cases, and reworded "are found on Trinidad and Tobago" to "are found in Trinidad and Tobago". Now that the references and notes have been altered so greatly, I am unsure which note is mentioned as being unreferenced. Neelix (talk) 20:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of snakes of Trinidad and Tobago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]