Talk:List of synagogues in Ukraine

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why I did not include any citation.

I am well aware that statements in Wikipedia should always cite their sources. This is a list of synagogues in Ukraine, in which case each synagogue listed has an article in Wikipedia. I hope (I have checked some) that for the statements that would need a citation (columns Built, Destroyed and Remarks) the sources are given in the related articles. For instance the entry for the Synagogue Chernivtsi - Czernowitz Synagogue gives a source for these statements (http://cja.huji.ac.il/Architecture/Czernowitz/Czernowitz-Temple/Temple-stages.html). So I do not think this is a case of citing Wikipedia as a source.

If this is not sufficient I see two alternatives: state the sources from the articles here once more, something I think is not necessary and involves a lot of formal work, or delete the three columns. That would satisfy the formal requirements, but it would not make the list any better (my opinion).

As I work on the similar list in German, I hope I can both improve this list and add more articles, but this will take some time. I do intend to check the sources in the articles and add them where they are missing or incomplete. --Wanfried-Dublin (talk) 07:12, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Representation of dates in columns Built and Destroyed

These two columns are sortable. But this only makes sense if they are numbers. In another list (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_von_Synagogen_in_Wei%C3%9Frussland) I overcame this problem by using italics, if the exact date is unclear and including a comment either in the column, seperated by br / or using the Remarks-column. I am not very busy at Wikipedia at the moment, but if this change is acceptable, I would start changing the columns so that they are properly sortable afterwards and no information is lost. --Wanfried-Dublin (talk) 09:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some ideas to improve this list

Column Oblast: as the header already states Oblast, the entries do not need the word Oblast; when I have some time I will delete it (in some rows they are already absent).

But more important: should every entry have a Wikilink for the relevant Oblast, or only the first entry of each Oblast? I would appreciate some opinions about this topic before I start changing the column.

Pictutes: whenever a picture exists in Commons, it should be shown in this column; only in cases where no picture in Commons is available an external link (to judaica.cz or any other website) should be used. Again, before starting work on this, I would welcome other opinions.

Regards--Wanfried-Dublin (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]