Talk:List of wolf attacks in North America

Ski Hill incident of December 7 2016

Now please let's just talk about this a second. This Albertan ski hill worker seems to have only been chased on a snowmobile for a bit, that's all. Does that constitute an "attack"? Chrisrus (talk) 01:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

The Feb 24 addition is not a wolf attack on a human

The Feb 24 addition is not a wolf attack on a human, it is a wolf attack on a dog. I decided to mention here rather then revert North8000 (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Please just revert such things. Don't be shy! Please remove any item which is not a wolf attack on a human in North America. We need your help. Chrisrus (talk) 20:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of wolf attacks in North America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109205016/http://www.wnmuoutdoors.org/PDF/Linnell2002_Wolves.pdf to http://www.wnmuoutdoors.org/PDF/Linnell2002_Wolves.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Dubious *and* duplicate

The 1867 hunter stories are not only duplicates of one another, but they are of dubious athenticity. At the very least, delete the Texas entry. There is no White County, Texas, the "article" cited gives no names, and lists a deer--not a bear--as the source of the magical wolf-summoning blood. That entire section of the cited paper reads like a rumor mill of less solid record than the National Enquirer. Read the adjacent paragraphs. It's clearly a section for entertaining stories--not serious news. The editor of this page needs to quit being lazy and actually check the citations. This is the kind of page that gives Wikipedia a bad name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.152.225.44 (talk) 03:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

There is no "the editor".....the article is edited by many volunteers which can include you. But I'll take out the texas entry North8000 (talk) 17:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Date format

Due to the various date formats used, it's impossible to sort the list by date. If all dates started with year number, like "2099, Winter" would that work?