Talk:Lists of extinct species

Extinction High‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals Mid‑importance

Lists of extinct species is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

WP:DABCONCEPT violation

Lists of lists are not ambiguous if there is a commonality to those lists. In this case, that commonality is Extinction. Normally, the solution to a WP:DABCONCEPT violation like this is to write an article broadly discussing the topic at this title; however, in this case, that article already exists at extinction, which specifically discusses the extinction of both animals and plants at the species level, and which already contains the two links on this page. Therefore, the solution seems to me to be redirecting this title to Extinction. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I read it less rigidly. There are several other "lists" that need to be here, I've added two. There are several articles that need to be created and have not been that are separate or sub categories, List of extinct insects, List of extinct arachnids, etc. These would be added to the list. Lists of lists aren't always bad, and this seems logical to list the most basic of lists that relate to extinction. Nothing wrong with having a see also, to extinction, which I will add. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lists of lists are not bad, but neither are they ambiguous. Mercury is ambiguous; it may refer to a god, a planet, an element, a car, or a singer, among other things. Extinct species are merely species that are extinct. There is no ambiguous element to justfy calling this a disambiguation page. bd2412 T 18:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the appropriate resolution at this point is to move the page to Lists of extinct species. It is becoming even more apparent that this is a list of lists, since none of the titles is of a separate thing such as a song, album, person, or place called "extinct species". bd2412 T 16:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very good idea, and I would be on board for that. I get what you are saying now about the lack of ambiguity now. If there ever comes a time when this title needs to be a real db page, we can deal with it then. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:50, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Good. I will implement this proposal. bd2412 T 17:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now we just need someone to start the two redlinks. I don't think this list needs to differentiate by region (ie: Europe, Asia) and instead focus only on different species, the actual title. The other lists can break it down by region where appropriate. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Complete list of extinct species" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complete list of extinct species. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete list of extinct species until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 11:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look at what we humans have to nature

Remember there is no planet B so becareful to what you do to our planet 2A01:C22:AC4F:E200:C9F2:201F:5A0D:21B5 (talk) 07:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where should "Extinct species" lead to?

Currently the redirect "Extinct species" leads here, but I think it should lead to "Extinction" instead. Should that be changed? CheeseyHead (talk) 21:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are extinct clades redacted from articles they are most closely related to? Example, you have to easter egg search for extinct clades of Carnivora instead of just looking up Carnivora which presently does not include extinct clades that fall under the Order Carnivora. User:cn7614929 7:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.38.212.201 (talk)

Plants

The lack of lists in the plants section kills me... Not really, it's just that I want to research random plants from millions of years ago, not 10 years ago, lol. 139.130.155.226 (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@139.130.155.226: I was the one personally responsible for getting deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of extinct plants. You really aren't missing much (here's an archived copy) Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]