Talk:Lithuanian accentuation

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Review comments: M.K. (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Accentuation tables for adjectives would make me weak in the knees. — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 13:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithuanian accentuation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413131552/http://www.leidykla.eu/fileadmin/Baltistika/43-3/381-403.pdf to http://www.leidykla.eu/fileadmin/Baltistika/43-3/381-403.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

Frankly this page is almost impossible for anyone to use except trained linguists. Almost nothing is broken down sufficiently nor are examples provided for people not deeply versed in linguistic terminology to understand what the page talks about .It would be greatly appreciated if someone spent some time to make this page useable for the lay people. Looking at this page atm makes me want to hit my head on a wall. RadomirZinovyev 19:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is certainly true that there are places where it could be made clearer and simpler. One thing that is confusing is that it isn't always clear whether "accent" refers to the pronunciation of a sound or to the written accent. For example, in the first sentence it says "stressed heavy syllables are pronounced in one of two prosodically distinct ways that are determined by accent and pitch". What does "accent" mean there? The last seven words seem to me to be rather confusing, which is particularly undesirable in an introduction. I have attempted to edit the first paragraph to make it a bit clearer. How is it now? Kanjuzi (talk) 21:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The section "Syllable weight" is also very badly written. How can a sound like /ie/ or /uo/ can be described as a "monophthong"? And what are "mixed acute diphthongs"? These haven't been defined. The second paragraph would be much clearer if first something could be said about the different kinds of diacritic marks, together with examples of words illustrating each one. Kanjuzi (talk) 21:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of the article references concepts in the start sections, which are only explained / exampled further down. A lot of jumping around to see the basics of what it's trying to explain. RadomirZinovyev 16:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]