Talk:LittleBigPlanet

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:LittleBigPlanet - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 09:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:LittleBigPlanet (PlayStation 3) - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 21:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article names

Continuing discussion from here regarding whether LittleBigPlanet article titles should be disambiguated using year rather than platform.

Just to reiterate what I said in the original discussion, WP:NCVG says that for ports/remakes the platform should be used to disambiguate games of the same name. I know these aren't really ports or re-makes but I think that makes more sense in this case. Most of the games are on different platforms and as they're released relatively close to each other (2008, 2009, 2011 and 2012) many people will not know which one is which from the year alone. Chimpanzee ^{Us | Ta | Co} 16:02, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LittleBigPlanet Karting

I've created and redirected LittleBigPlanet Karting to this article. - X201 (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Little Big Planet 3-6?

Why are games three through six listed with release dates? I'm fairly certain none of that is confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.229.189.199 (talk) 00:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, well spotted. It was vandalism. If you see anything blatantly untrue like that again, feel free to remove it. - X201 (talk) 08:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The “Setting” category

The following part of the paragraph “Setting” seems to describe LittleBigPlanet 1 rather than the entire series:

“The game takes place in a world known as LittleBigPlanet, sometimes referred to as Craftworld, which was created by the eight curators. Each curator is in-charge of a part of LittleBigPlanet and they govern them independently. LittleBigPlanet has geography inspired by the real-life Earth, with various levels inspired by Africa, Australia and Japan among others present in the game. …”

What should we do? —The Sackinator (talk) 23:06, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LittleBigPlanet HUB

I have a question? What's outdated about LittleBigPlanet HUB? The release date? The game itself? I'd like to know. —The Sackinator (talk) 20:55, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS3 version

@Greentoastpro: There is nothing wrong with using playstationlifestyle.net as a source, it is not on the WP:VG banned list. Playstation Lifestyle is used as a source in 121 Wikipedia articles. Here is another link that also supports the PS3 claim. Pocket-lint is used as a source in 241 Wikipedia articles. Could you please explain your reasons for reverting a sourced statement?- X201 (talk) 08:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also: word of god confirms this too. --MASEM (t) 13:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Masem: Following the latest revert I've asked User:Greentoastpro to come here and discuss it. As a new user I've also pointed out that they are sailing close to the wind regarding 3RR.- X201 (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LittleBigPlanet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100513031953/http://www.littlebigplanet.com/en-us/2/ to http://www.littlebigplanet.com/en-us/2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

The attacks were a DDoS on the servers

Hello pals!

I distinctly remember that the attacks on the servers were specifically a DDoS done by a controversial member of the community. It was done by overflowing the servers with level publishing. However, I'm not too sure if something this minute can be put in; I just want it to be more specific. Can anyone help with this? Sorry if this is weird, I'm still new to Wikipedia. Thank you!

Mineplanet84 (talk) 13:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]