Jump to content

Talk:Liz Kelly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liz Kelly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal: Liz Kelly bibliography into this article

[edit]

No need for seperate bibliography, I propose a merge. Sxologist (talk) 00:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sxologist: I'm not seeing guidelines about when a separate bibliography is appropriate. Nothing is apparent to me in MOS:WORKS. Since it's far too long to be copied and pasted into Liz Kelly and someone took the time to compile it, I'm inclined to keep it. Daask (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge, wholesale or with a trim; the bibliography is a trivial list of publications, less helpful than clicking the World-Cat link in the authority control box on Kelly's page. Having said this, even a whole-sale merge would not be WP:TOOBIG. I also don't support the argument that as "someone took the time to compile it [we should] keep it"; there is a lot of material on Wikipedia that other have worked on, but that should nevertheless be deleted as it is not encylopaedic. Klbrain (talk) 21:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 06:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]