Jump to content

Talk:Lizard Head

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lizard Head. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correct elevation

[edit]

GNIS says this mountain's elevation is 12,995 feet. See reference number 3. I plan on editing the article to reflect this. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

So, GNIS is not the best source of summit elevations, for two reasons.
  1. GNIS elevation data is not taken from benchmarks: it's derived from a digital elevation map. For very steep peaks (like Lizard Head), that means the GNIS elevations often underestimate the true height. If you go to the Peakbagger site for Lizard Head, and you look at the USGS topo map, you'll see that the peak elevation is shown at 13,113 feet. That's substantially higher than the GNIS elevation. That would be the true elevation of the peak.
  2. Both GNIS and topo maps use the NGVD29 vertical datum. The elevation of above sea level depends on the definition of the shape of the Earth. The most accurate and modern shape of the Earth is captured in the NAVD88 vertical datum, which, for peaks in southwest Colorado, add about 6 feet to the elevation. Peakbagger lists the NAVD88 elevation (so it's verifiable). The guidance from WP:WikiProject Mountains is to use NAVD88 --- Footwarrior converted this article in 2013, while Buaidh added an explanatory footnote in 2014.
Bottom line: I think that the elevation in the article should remain at 13,119 feet in the NAVD88 datum. —hike395 (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, this is helpful. I just changed my plans. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]