Talk:Lizzy Bardsley

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Can someone please add a small section about her reality TV "achievements" as I am not in the least bit interested, but feel it needs to go in. s p u n k o 2 0 1 0 19:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --UpDown 21:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh gods, I actually know this woman's son from high school, can't believe she has her own page here. Would it be worthwhile adding about her benefit fraudery to the article, if she's really that important to have a page? (it's been in the Rochdale Observer and North West Tonight quite a bit over the past few years so there should be no problems sourcing it)82.19.25.202 22:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's already a couple of references to her benefit fraudery in the article. Actually, if anyone has the time, it might be worth elaborating on the point - she's become a shining example of the problem.

Reference numbers 2 & 3 on this page both from Rochdale Observer are incorrect and link to completely different stories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.12.177.88 (talk) 00:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Titles

as per edit summaries, I've made the titles of the crime sections more descriptive and relevant to what they actually describe. The previous date+incident didn't seem too appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayman60 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]