Talk:Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

subsequent developments[edit]

Great to have this article here, at all. Needs work of course, as every young article does. Subsequent developments does not describe what the paragraph contains. Plus it is too heavy on the platitudes. ( Martin | talkcontribs 03:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Property rights have always been in tension with human rights. Remember slavery? Every law reapportions rights. ( Martin | talkcontribs 03:38, 8 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Opinion of the court[edit]

What did the court decide?? ( Martin | talkcontribs 03:43, 8 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Thoughts for Organization[edit]

I've been spending some time trying to find a way to rework this article. My conclusion is to increase the number of subheadings. I plan to keep the original work and elaborate more on the topic. My plan to break it up is to add Rise of Malls, Public or Private Property, Background, Decision, and Significance. I look forward to any suggestions. Avannes2 (talk) 22:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Austin R. Van Nest[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Massachusetts, Amherst supported by WikiProject Politics and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]