Talk:Location of Earth

Location of Earth is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 13, 2015	Featured list candidate	Not promoted

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 October 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Cosmology / Solar System High‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Cosmology task force.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science High‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Purpose[edit]

I created this table after I heard an author on NPR say that her literary agent didn't know the difference between the solar system, the galaxy, and the universe, and asked her to write a book on the subject (which she did). I looked at some of our articles, and as they were, I'm not sure they help all that much. It's difficult for individual articles to put this information in context, so I'm creating this template to help do that. -- Beland (talk) 04:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't this replicate the function of {{Earth's location}} ? 76.66.196.139 (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete disputed[edit]

This template is the target of an "expand" link from Template:UniverseNavSmall. There might be a better way to present this information, but this is what I came up with for a rough draft. I'm open to suggestions. -- Beland (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be an article masquerading as a template... Instead of a non-transcluded template, shouldn't this just be created as an article? 76.66.196.139 (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's now a full fledged article... 76.66.197.30 (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tidy up.[edit]

I've just been doing some maintenance of this article. If anyone disagrees with my changes, please let me know, as I can and will defend them. Cheers. Frunk (talk) 10:58, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From {{Earth's location}}[edit]

Heirarchy

Earth
- Earth-Moon System
  - Terrestrial planets
    - Solar System
      - Solar Neighborhood
        Local Fluff
        Local Bubble
        Orion Arm
        disk of the Milky Way
        Milky Way Galaxy
        Galactic Realm
        Local Group
        Virgo Cloud
        Local Supercluster
        The Observable universe
        The Universe
        The Multiverse
        The Omniverse
        Eternity/Infinity

Related[edit]

now that this has been renamed, should the related {{UniverseNavSmall}} also be renamed, since there's no "big" one anymore. 76.66.197.30 (talk) 02:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That template is unnecessary; it says exactly the same thing as {{Earth's location}}, which which is far prettier and less obstructive. I was, rather ironically, planning to nominate it for deletion.Serendi ^pod ous 10:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But does it live up to the title?[edit]

This article is an excellent summary of the various levels and categories of space, as they relate to the earth, but I came to it hoping to learn whether earth is at the center or near the edge of the known universe, only to find that the question is not even addressed.

It would be useful to have it considered in the article, even if the answer is that we cannot know the answer.--71.242.167.95 (talk) 14:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to current theories in cosmology, the universe is homogeneous and isotropic, meaning that it has no "centre" and no "edge". Every point in the universe could be seen as the centre, just as every point on the surface of the Earth could be seen as the middle. Serendi ^pod ous 16:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

table[edit]

it should also have a log scale for size. Nergaal (talk) 01:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How should it be represented?Serendi ^pod ous 01:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Log scale is added - column "(km, as a power of 10, Logarithmic scale)" Grillofrances (talk) 00:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earth's position in relation to the observable universe[edit]

If the observable universe is a sphere at the "edges" of which we see a younger version of the universe (photon decoupling, close to the big bang, etc). This would mean the Earth is at the centre of this "sphere" of a certain diameter. Finite or infinite it is then an actual sphere towards the edges of which the "structure" of what we see changes, or begins to change.

If this sphere which is bounded by the structure changes occuring at its outer edges has a certain definite diameter in lightyears, putting the Earth at the center is a little weird.

This should be addressed as it is a basic question regarding Earth's position in the Universe, and the article makes no mention of it. (I.e. that the changes in structure at the edges of the observable Universe are equidistant in all directions. Puts Earth in the middle of everything)

it says in the opener that astronomers usually place the Earth at the centre of the observable universe for convenience. Serendi ^pod ous 14:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but nevermind, I get it now; the spherical "pocket" of the observable universe does not denote the entirety of the universe. It could just be like any bubble inside an aquarium, towards the edges of the bubble we see an older version of the "surroundings", but how big those surroundings are, i.e. How big the aquarium is is not known. And we are ofcourse precisely in the middle of our view bubble.

Where it gets interesting is if there are models that theorize about the relationship in terms of scale of the observable universe (our pocket) and the entire universe (the aquarium), because then perhaps one can deduce where our "bubble" is in relation to the centre of the aquarium.

Multiverse and scale of the Universe.[edit]

I feel that the multiverse should be added as it is a possibility and would impact cosmology.

In addition, I feel that this article could be part of a series of articles covering the scale of the Universe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AHumanEditor (talk • contribs) 00:50, July 29, 2017 (UTC)

The multiverse is purely hypothetical. There is zero evidence for it. We mention the hypothetical possibility, but we don't need to include it in the table of Earth's position in the Universe. Meters (talk) 05:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Earth's location in the Universe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earth's location in the Universe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/618QHms8h?url=http://www.fai.org/astronautics/100km.asp to http://www.fai.org/icare-records/100km-altitude-boundary-for-astronautics

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 April 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page to Location of Earth, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 17:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Earth's location in the Universe → Location of Earth – The formatting of the proposed title is better. 2601:183:101:58D0:6C85:D0F:8214:9B38 (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest Location of Earth - I agree removing the possessive form is more encyclopedic, but also "in the Universe" seems a bit redundant. -- Netoholic @ 23:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with you 100%. Should I change my proposal to Location of Earth instead? 2601:183:101:58D0:41:33D3:8C5F:5399 (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - If you like it better, you can edit the request above (two spots to change), or you can leave it and can wait for others to add their input. -- Netoholic @ 02:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support 'Location of Earth', which I will need to find the damn thing sometimes. Earth keeps going off on a tangent well on its own way, and I have to either catch up or latch onto it next time around. Thus this article is a goddess-send (factoid: godsend is one word and goddesssend isn't). Randy Kryn (talk) 17:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per WP:CONCISE._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:22, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rreagan007 (talk) 19:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support: What other universes need we disstinguish from? –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Pisces-Cetus supercluster complex[edit]

This is an issue that needs to be resolved, but I don't know how to do it. Since the discovery of Laniakea, we haven't really confirmed whether it replaced the Pisces-Cetus supercluster complex or subsumed it. Problem is, most of the references to the "Pisces Cetus supercluster complex" are from decades ago (it was first proposed in the 1980s and no one uses the term "supercluster complex" any more) so any references to Laniakea are likely to ignore it completely.Serendi ^podous 09:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]