Jump to content

Talk:Lockheed XF-104 Starfighter/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    What makes Ejectionsite.com a reliable source? Is Kevin Coyne a noted expert on the subject (i.e., has his work been published in reliable sources elsewhere)?
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    The article is in great shape, excellent work! The only thing holding up promotion is whether Ejectionsite.com is a reliable source or not. Parsecboy (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Website has been removed, so passing for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]