Talk:London Underground stations that are listed buildings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. bd2412 T 13:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of listed London Underground stations → London Underground stations that are listed buildings – Moving this article to this name was discussed during the last peer review. It was thought that the current title could confuse (it's not clear what 'listed' means), and I've discovered that although starting List of is standard practice, this appears to avoided with lists of listed buildings. All those listed at WP:FL have the form Listed buildings in Rivington. Relisted. BDD (talk) 05:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC) Edgepedia (talk) 05:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support moving. Agree the current title is confusing, and could be interpreted as a list of stations that are on (other) lists, but think we should avoid using that are in the article title. How about London Underground listed buildings? Anyone have any other suggestions? Zarcadia (talk) 08:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
London Underground has other listed buildings that are not stations. Liverpool Street signal box, for example. Edgepedia (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

.... or more seriously List of London Underground stations with Listed status? Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 12:10, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The two lists have the name, a photo and the lines served in duplicate. To merge the two lists there would need work combining the dates columns, this article has dates for the parts of the buildings that are listed, and the location. There would also need some work on the lead. This also has the listing grade, architect and a fairly wide notes column, and I don't see that fitting on my monitor. Edgepedia (talk) 12:56, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For example
Station Photo Line(s)[*] Location Zone(s)[†] Dates Mainline
opened 		Other name(s)[note 1] Usage[1] Listed building Grade Architect Notes
Acton Town A brown-bricked building with a flat-slabbed roof and six columns of windows on the front face standing below a blue sky with white clouds District
Piccadilly		 Ealing
51°30′10.1″N 0°16′48″W / 51.502806°N 0.28000°W / 51.502806; -0.28000 (Acton Town tube station)
3
 Opened
1 July 1879
[2] Listed building:1932		 Mill Hill Park: 1879–1910
5.46
II
 Charles Holden Opened in 1879 by the District Railway and rebuilt in 1910, it is the subsequent 1932 Holden building that is listed.[3]
  1. ^ The other names listed may have been used previously on station signage, on network maps, in advertisements or in planning material – Harris, Cyril M. (2006) [1977]. What's in a name?. Capital Transport. ISBN 1-85414-241-0. In the early years, slightly different names were sometimes employed contemporaneously for different purposes or on different parts of a station. A number of stations continue to bear obsolete early names where these form part of the physical architecture. For example, the platform wall tiling at Arsenal, Hampstead, Marylebone and Warren Street still carries the original names of these stations.
  1. ^ All Usage statistics (total entry plus exits) are in millions per year for 2011 (Blackfriars station was closed during this period) – "Multi-year station entry-and-exit figures (2007–2017)". London Underground station passenger usage data. Transport for London. January 2018. Archived from the original (XLSX) on 31 July 2018. Retrieved 22 July 2018..
  2. ^ Rose, Douglas (1999). The London Underground, A Diagrammatic History. London: Douglas Rose/Capital Transport. ISBN 1-85414-219-4. OCLC 59556887.
  3. ^ Leboff 1994, p. 6.

It's not working for me. And you can't sort by the two dates in the date column. Edgepedia (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What about London Underground stations with Listed status? Edgepedia (talk) 13:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe the lists should be merged; it would add a lot of complication to the list for something that is relevant to only about a quarter of the stations. I think "London Underground stations that are listed buildings" is more appropriate because it explains what the page is about. "Listed status" is unclear.--DavidCane (talk) 22:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support move as originally proposed ("London Underground stations that are listed buildings") as that is the clearest of all the suggestions. Oppose merge per DavidCane. Thryduulf (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 79 external links on London Underground stations that are listed buildings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:London_Underground_stations_that_are_listed_buildings&oldid=1208568114"