Talk:Lord Flashheart

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Lord Flashheart received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Really?[edit]

"However, in reality, The Red Baron did not die in such a fashion." You mean to tell me he was not really shot by Rik Mayall? Astonishing. Trollderella 23:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I couldn't believe this either; I'd always thought Mayall was older than he looked. —Sam Wilson (Australia) 00:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is Flashheart Flashman?[edit]

Anyone know of any connection with the great Flashman? I'm sure Curtis, Atkinson and Elton would've read the Flashman books, and maybe there's some slight tie there, what with the name and all... —Sam Wilson (Australia) 00:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is flopped[edit]

Photograph is flopped (left and right are reversed) and should be corrected. Danellicus 18:07, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rik flash.jpg[edit]

Image:Rik flash.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this page need to exist?[edit]

It reads more like an extract from a humorous Blackadder Xmas annual than an encyclopedia entry.

Is this character worthy of a page - 2 appearances with relatively few lines (most of which are repeated here), very little in the way of citations.

If no-one else expresses an opinion I will attempt to trim significantly.

Mclusky1 (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]