Talk:Lorence G. Collins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lorence G. Collins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources[edit]

I will give it until Sunday before I start to remove anything sources to his own works. After that we can see if what is left is worth keepingSlatersteven (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather the had not been a carpet bombing attack on this page. Not all of it was rubbish.Slatersteven (talk) 10:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing notable in this article-- little if anything encyclopedic. In reviewing the German version, it seems to contain all of the original research and unreferenced material that apparently caused this version to be "carpet bombed". Is there anything here worthy of a Wikipedia article or should it just be scrapped?76.20.237.106 (talk) 23:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remote sensing[edit]

San Fernando Valley State College had a course in remote sensing? I think we need a source for that clai=m. I am not sure any US college ever had an official course in something this iffy.Slatersteven (talk) 09:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since by only this context it's unclear what you meant by iffy: remote sensing, while being a very general description for a number of technologies and techniques, does not mean remote viewing. —PaleoNeonate – 14:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh valid, yes I did get the two confused.Slatersteven (talk) 10:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]