Talk:Lorillard Tobacco Company
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lorillard Tobacco Company article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. (July 2013) The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
[edit]
--Maoririder 18:50, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:LorillardLogo.gif
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:LorillardLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
What?
[edit]is the 18th oldest company in the United States and the nation's oldest tobacco company.
It is an American company right? Does this make any sense then? How can you be the 18th oldest and the oldest? I assume when you say nation you mean the United States? Please clarify or edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.205.54.4 (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Makes perfect sense to me. It just means that the 17 US companies older than Lorillard aren't tobacco companies. What's the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.183.12 (talk) 15:49, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Intro sentence makes no sense
[edit]"Lorillard Tobacco Company is the 18th oldest company in the United States and the nation's oldest tobacco company"
So which is it? 71.0.115.130 (talk) 22:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- It is both the 18th oldest company in the United States and the oldest tobacco company in the United States. I cannot think of a clearer way to word that. Tomsv 98 (talk) 21:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
E-cigarette blu Plus+™
[edit]I just ran across a full page ad[1] for blu Plus+ e-cigarettes containing the small print line, "© 2015 LOEC, Inc... blu™, blu e-cigs®, the blu Plus+™ logo, blu Plus+™, and blu Tanks™ are trademarks of Lorillard Technologies, Inc." The disambiguation page for "Blu" indicates inter alia, "Blu, a brand of electronic cigarette owned by Lorillard Tobacco Company." I also noticed that the disambiguation page for "Lorillard" doesn't mention either Lorillard, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company's parent firm, or Lorillard Technologies, Inc., presumably because there's no Wikipedia entry yet for Lorillard Technologies. For the convenience of whoever usually edits this page: http://blucigs.com and http://www.lorillard.com
☺ Dick Kimball (talk) 14:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- ^ digboston free weekly newspaper, Vol. 17, Issue 3, 1/21/2015 – 1/28/2015, http://digboston.com
You failed to include that the company had a manufacturing plant in middletown ohio making a chewing tobacco called polar bear. the plant closed posibly in the thirties or forties. The plant at central and charles near the big four rr was closed before I arrived here in nineteen fifty nine. the plant was razed in the early sixties — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.168.128.10 (talk) 08:42, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Price
[edit]Why are Kent's going up every month 99.116.101.75 (talk) 14:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia requested logos