Talk:Lorne (electoral district)

Lorne (electoral district) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 12, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Canada: Saskatchewan / Northwest Territories / Electoral districts Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian Territories.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA on hold[edit]

This article is well written, and provides a broad and relatively detailed overview of the article. It has proper referencing, MOS and is NPOV. Some things that are standard in modern politics, which are not covered below.This may be becuase the politics of the time made it irrelevant

Do we know the demographics of the seat? Rural, industrial, old people, young people? What are the main local characteristics of the seat
Do we know the parties which the candidates represented.

Apart from that, it should be good to go. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for the questions, I will try and address them in the article. There were no party politics in the Northwest Territories in that period. I will dig around Stats Canada, I actually had not thought about trying to inject demographic statistics in the article, so I will have to go dig around the Government documents branch of the Library to see if I can find of the area in that period. I am working on trying to make a rough riding map of the boundaries described in the original proclamation.--Cloveious 08:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I think it is good enough for GA in spite of the missing info, although for FA, it would be good to have that info. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Its on my to do list, I am going to try and get my hands on some rolls of microfiche. I am hoping newspapers from back then can expand on the campaigns, and might give something usable for demographics --Cloveious 02:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. Ucucha 18:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lorne (N.W.T. electoral district) → Lorne (electoral district) — Following the standard across pretty much the rest of Canadian electoral district articles. There is nothing currently at Lorne (electoral district) so there is no need for the N.W.T. disambiguator. —JulieSpaulding (talk) 12:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It looks like almost all the articles in Category:Former Northwest Territories electoral districts use "N.W.T. electoral district". Station1 (talk) 07:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lorne (electoral district). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090310232606/http://fransaskois.sk.ca:80/communaute/community/pa/chapitre1.htm to http://fransaskois.sk.ca/communaute/community/pa/chapitre1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lorne (electoral district). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lorne (electoral district). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071225102109/http://www.assembly.gov.nt.ca/_live/pages/wpPages/publicinformationfactsheets.aspx to http://www.assembly.gov.nt.ca/_live/pages/wpPages/publicinformationfactsheets.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]