Talk:Lost minor planet

Copy-editing[edit]

In response to the copy-editing request, I undertook to make the article easier to understand, but there's still a lot of room for improvement. For one thing, I'm not sure I understand the rationale for discussing minor planets up to 1000 and those above 1000 in separate sections. And within those sections (if they're even retained), I'm not sure how best to organize the paragraphs. For now, I tried to arrange mentions of each minor planet roughly in order of rediscovery, as that is part of what makes them "lost", but there's probably a better way. And while 1009 Sirene is mentioned, I'm not certain whether it actually is a lost asteroid—there's no further discussion of it here, and its main article doesn't currently call it one. Lusanaherandraton (talk) 10:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that the 1,000 asteroids were discovered back in a time when the number of telescopes available to track and refine the orbits was much more limited. Asteroid 1009 Sirene has an orbit quality (condition code) of 1 and is not lost. The largest asteroid (dwarf planet) Ceres has an orbit quality of 0 where-as poorly know orbits would have a quality of 5 to 8. -- Kheider (talk) 17:45, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Sirene was recovered in 1982[1]. Fotaun (talk) 16:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lost minor planet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lost minor planet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090330022654/http://www.scribd.com/doc/9378417/Dictionary-of-Minor-Planet-Names to https://www.scribd.com/doc/9378417/Dictionary-of-Minor-Planet-Names

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]