Talk:Lotus Excel

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Why is there a future section? I've tidied it up, but it seems like this belongs under the "Lotus" category and not under specific cars. Suggest removing it. --86.16.190.232 (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Hotlorp (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added the exact info "Excel Milestones" as part of an Open University assignment requiring me to do an edit. The "paste operation" I performed has resulted in some unwanted formatting. The dotted box around the '87 yr is unintended. Also, the info in brackets should be under each new model year. If anyone could correct these, I and others would appreciate it. Mickymicky99 (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may want to do another edit and remove what you've added, because this looks like rubbish and you've destroyed the layout of the article. Better learn about Wikipedia editing and standards before going ahead. You even managed to muck up the wiki-code on this talk page, which I've fixed. SeverityOne (talk) 08:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1986 Excel SE horsepower

I was browsing through scans of old Motorweek Rivals segments and came across a quick blurb about the 1986 Excel SE stating that it produces 190 bhp, not 180 (Torque is listed as the same 165). I'm wondering if this is an error/misprint on their part, or whether the article is wrong. Most online sources seem to quote the 180hp figure. Here's a link [1] to the picture of the Motorweek section. TKOIII (talk) 20:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what other period published sources say when I get a minute. Nudge me in a week if there is no response; I may be pinned under a stack of old Auto Katalog. Mr.choppers | ✎ 20:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]