A fact from Love's Messenger appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the 1885 watercolor painting Love's Messenger(pictured) shows several symbols of "beauty, love, and abundance of Venus and the sensuality and unpredictability of her son Cupid"?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is related to the Delaware Art Museum. Please copy quality assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed, and assign importance in accordance with the project's guidelines.Delaware Art MuseumWikipedia:GLAM/Delaware Art MuseumTemplate:WikiProject Delaware Art MuseumDelaware Art Museum-related articles
Is the "p. 395" in the reference listing for Waking Dreams a copy-paste, or are you citing that page as well?
I'll see if I have anything more on this work tonight. I'd love to find someone comparing the composition to Mariana and Waterhouse's Lady of Shallot - all these women working embroideries in front of windows... - PKM (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The first "pp. 395" is the number of total pages in the book. The "See, especially, pp. 262-263" is the section on Love's Messenger, though there are other brief mentions in the book. I think this is the way to express this, but I've had others question the format in other places. Any suggestions? Smallbones (talk) 17:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
