Talk:Love & Gravity/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello editors. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. Check back a little later for an analysis. Tim meh (review me) 22:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The fair use screenshots don't look like they have a purpose here. They shouldn't be here unless they exemplify something further than the text could, and there isn't even any text describing the music videos.

The references aren't formatted consistently. They should all have access dates and the publishers should be wikilinked.

There aren't any sources for the chart positions. There needs to be a reliable source for each. See Wikipedia:Record charts for a list of good archive sites.

Upon quick scanning, the article looks lacking in sources, and I see a large amount of CMT lyrics pages cited. More on this later... Tim meh (review me) 22:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is definitely lacking in sources. I see three whole paragraphs that are completely unsourced. Every claim of fact must cite a reliable source. The article is also a bit quote-heavy. This shows in the references. About a third of them are to song lyrics.

I suggest merging the "tracks" and "singles" sections. There's no need to have a separate section just to describe the singles. Also, the track-by-track descriptions need to be shortened and summarized. The section is too long as is. The article setup seems a bit odd to me as well. Take a look at Wikipedia:Album#Article body for an idea of what the main points of the article should be.

It's going to take a lot of work on your part, as these are major issues, but I'll give you a chance to bring this up to GA quality. I'm going to put the article on hold for now so you have a chance to work on it and fix the issues. I'll give you a few days to get the issues dealt with. Tim meh (review me) 02:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been very busy lately. I don't know when I'll be able to address these issues but I will address them eventually.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I'm going to have to fail this. It's been 26 days since I put the review on hold, and the normal allowance is only a week. Feel free to resubmit it to WP:GAN when you've addressed my concerns. Tim meh 23:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]