Talk:Love Ballad (Tove Lo song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Azealia911 (talk · contribs) 23:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Infobox and lead[edit]

Hmm, it will have to do, I'd add the source to the release history under digital download, and change the release date in the infobox. Everything else looks great, so once this is done I will pass the article. Azealia911 talk
 Done. --Paparazzzi (talk) 07:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Background and release[edit]

  • Would it be possible to use a more interesting caption? Perhaps something like "Tove Lo (pictured) wrote "Love Ballad" after confessing to feeling "lost" when writing songs for others"  Done
  • "songs; she" → "songs, and she"  Done
  • Link Nordic.  Done
  • "as a bonus track on her debut studio album" → "as a bonus track on the North American version of her debut studio album"  Done

Music video[edit]

  • Per WP:NFCC point 8, "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." How does the screenshot of the music video help us understand the music video? Have critics praised the black paint? Did they find it odd?  Done
  • No reviews or comments made about the music video by anyone?  Comment: The only comment from a reliable source is one by Michael Craigg wich says "The video was self-produced alongside Swedish artists Motellet Film and features a lot of paint, some rugby players and a fairly cold Lo".

Live performances[edit]

  • "London In Stereo" → "London in Stereo"  Done

References[edit]

  • #8 – Unlink The Guardian  Done
  • I see you've archived some links, the following look suspectable to link rot and I recommend archiving them also; 15, 19, 20, 24.  Done

Post-review comments[edit]

  • This is a really strong article, it was challenging for me to find comments to address at all. On-hold for seven days, not that you'll need them. Azealia911 talk 13:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for the review and your comments :D. --Paparazzzi (talk) 04:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.