Talk:Lucille Cedercrans

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I've removed the db; we're working on the article. It will certainly be notable very soon. -- Chzz ► 06:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; I have made the article written less towards a Theosophist audience but added her into Category: Theosophists (which requires Categories: Esoterists, Mystics.) Unfortunately there is no 'Category: Perennial Philosophers,' because that precedes Theosophy and includes people that say things conservative Theosophists consider at least difficult/controversial. People that agree with HPB's Esoteric Instructions but say ideas in there differently let alone add to them are often called wrong by Theosophists who apparently never read the parts of Esoteric Instructions.

That is why she is notable in New Age or whatever, though I explained the categories that generally are more classically Philosophical & specific than that. Maybe she is non-notable for a general encyclopedia, but I would prefer a vote and asking [WP Occult] before deleting this. Cedercrans is one Philosopher (on my 20 page list of ones I consider worth researching) that I have not got around to reading in-depth yet, but she is in the highest middle part of my to-read list of modern ones.Dchmelik (talk) 07:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lucille Cedercrans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704055602/http://www.wisdomimpressions.com/newslet/Lucille.htm to http://www.wisdomimpressions.com/newslet/Lucille.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]