Talk:Lucretia (Rembrandt, 1666)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 24 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Melisa103.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

  • The Intro is really good, its short yet provides the perfect amount if information.
  • Rembrandt's interpretation could use more information. It doesn't provide Rembrandt's interpretation but rather Apler's interpretation.
  • The description is well written and very informative, it could just use a little more reference. There seems to only be one and it looks like it is only linked to the first half of the section.
  • The subject section is really informative and well written. My only critique would be that the last sentence is a little confusing.
  • I really enjoyed the influence section and could definitely see the connection between Caravaggio and Rembrandt. I was wondering if there were any other influences beside Caravaggio? How would he have seen Caravaggio's work?

Wiki Education assignment: Baroque Art[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2019 and 24 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Melisa103 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rmmiller364 (talk) 17:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]