Talk:Luna Mortis

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 June 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Name

Removed the CorenSearchBot tag from article. It appeared because I took the content from /Luna_mortis and moved it to /Luna_Mortis. I then redirected to old /Luna_mortis page to this one. This was done to correct the capitalization error in "mortis," as it should be a capital M. 16:04, 6 October 2008 User:Zarathustra323

Notability

Before this page gets deleted let me say this: They are signed to Century Media and are recording their depute album..so don't delete it mmk? I'm working on it. Zaruyache (talk) 23:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, some editors may think that the band isn't notable since they currently have only released one album on an indie label. However, this band seems like it still meets at least one other criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia under WP:MUSIC#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. The band has gotten a fair amount of attention from third party sources. --Nova Weaver (talk) 21:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genre

Why does this keep getting removed? Their style is really in the same vein as Into Eternity and Opeth. I agree that they are a melodic death metal band, but they aren't a melodeath band. There isn't enough deathgrowling to make death metal an actual genre here, since they switch between deathgrowling and clean singing, a la Into Eternity. The melodies come purely from their power metal influences, not from the death metal influences. Unless there is melody and deathgrowling going on a or near the same times, it's not melodic death metal; it's power metal. 71.162.47.115 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

It keeps getting removed because there is no reliable source attached to the claim that the band plays progressive death metal. Wikipedia has policies believe it or not. WP:V and WP:NOR are the two policies relevant to this discussion. Basically, WP:NOR states that Wikipedia is not the place for you to publish your own opinions, no matter how right you think you are and then WP:V explicitly states that "Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed." So ultimately, you may add progressive death metal to the article, but only if you can find reliable sources supporting that claim. --Nova Weaver (talk) 21:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly... they really arent death metal (even melodeath) ... They are mostly power metal but infuse progressive/thrash/gutenberg style riffs into their music along with the occasional death growls (which is what I imagine the source means when it calls them melodic death metal)... It just seems misleading to call them melodic death metal, particularly as the first genre... I mean, would you really group this band with Scar Symmetry and Children of Bodom ... or are they closer to Kiuas and 3 Inches of Blood ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dims25 (talk • contribs) 09:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Luna Mortis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]