This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Controversy sections are generally discouraged in articles as they impact neutrality. As it stands, the only points covered in this section are a delay to the project, and criticism that DART is a bit too expensive. These issues hardly constitute "protracted public disputes" and do not merit a separate section. I suggest they be merged back into the history section. Cnbrb (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it makes sense for delays to be in the "history" section. Perhaps the ticket price discussion could be included in a new section under "Operation"? Garuda3 (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Seems reasonable. I think that's where they were before. Cnbrb (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
