Talk:Lynton and Barnstaple Railway/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

 

Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 08:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 

Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment


Observations[edit]

This is a GA Reassessment: so a truncated set of observations...

  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  • Page created 23 May 2005
  • Page has 686 edits by 234 editors
  • 90 day page views = 3,602 with average of 40 visitors daily
  • 16 edits reverted
  • Page has 39 watchers.
  • Internet Archive Bot has been on page twice - last visit tagging no links as dead;
  • Cluebot NG has not visited, indicating no vandalism; page considered stable
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  • 11 images on article
  • all fair use rationales accepted, images have appropriate captioning
  1. Overall:
  • Basically, this page is in a Good Article shape and form. However, this page records the restoration of a closed narrow gauge railway in North Devon, UK, and should be updated on a regular basis. With 39 watchers, this should not be a difficult task. Below are some observations that may merit attention - and possibly inclusion - in various sections, such as Present, Restoration and Prospects.

 

Should these matters be responded or attended to, the article may retain GA status. --Whiteguru (talk) 04:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 

Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]