Talk:Lyoness/Archives/2016
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Repetitions...
Through the article there is a lot of repetitions.
Example: "In homeland Austria, Lyoness has been declared a pyramid scheme by four independent civil courts.[49] Criminal investigations have also been concluded by the Austrian Economic and Corruption Prosecutor ("WKStA"), who maintains that Lyoness operates an illegal pyramid scheme."
These two sentences are mentioned a bit too often.
But: "In October 2015, the Australian Federal Court found that the loyalty program is not a pyramid scheme as the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has originally claimed.[72] The latest decision in Austria also declared that Lyoness is not classified as fraud or any illegal pyramid scheme by the Austrian Economic and Corruption Prosecutor ("WKStA").[73][74] In April 2016, the Vienna Regional Court has stated that Lyoness is not a pyramid scheme. This decision is legally binding and can no longer be subject to appeal."
It would help the article if there were a Timeline witch stated when what happend, and when witch claims and court dicisions happend etc.
--90.149.224.55 (talk) 22:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)