Talk:Lyoness/Archives/2018

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 January 2018

Please add on the "Lyoness"-page the undermentioned under "New Judgments in Switzerland and Austria". In the German Wipikedia-Page, this information was already edited.

The Handelsgericht (the Commercial Court) of Vienna, Austria, has decided on July 20, 2017 in its judgment 581 cg 44/16y 11 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Handelsgericht was rendered based on legel action taken by an Austrian woman teacher.

The Bezirksgericht (the district court) of Traun, Austria, has decided on August 8, 2017 in its judment 2C312/17f-8 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Bezirksgericht was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian caretaker.

The Bezirksgericht (the district court) of Feldkirch, Austria, has decided on October 25, 2017 in its judgment 20C 260/16s that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Bezirksgericht was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian entrepeneur.

The Bezirksgericht (the district court) of Waidhofen, Austria, has decided on November 7, 2017 in its judment 8V 314/17g that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2to UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Bezirksgericht was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian private individual.

The Bezirksgericht (the district court) of Oberwart, Austria, has decided on November 17, 2017 in its judgment C715/17p-10 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art.Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Bezirksgericht was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian hotel manageress.

The Bezirksgericht (the district court) of Bludenz, Austria, has decided on November 29, 2017 in its judgment 3C 293/17h-19 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Bezirksgericht was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian entrepreneur.

The Bezirksgericht (the disctict court) of Sankt Johann, Austria, has decided on December 20, 2017 in its judgment 6C 459/16i-16 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Bezirksgericht was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian housing agent.

The Bezirksgericht (the district court) of Gänserndorf, Austria, has decided on December 29, 2017 in its judgment 12C105/172 that the business model of Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to § 2 UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Bezirksgericht was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian engineer.

The Handelsgericht (the commercial court) of Vienna, Austria, has decided on January 8, 2018 in its judgment 51Cg6/17i-21 that the business model von Lyoness Europe AG, Buchs, Switzerland, is to be considered as an unfair pyramid scheme in the meaning of Art. Z 14 in attachment to§ 2 UWG (Austrian law against unfair competition). The verdict of the Handelsgericht was rendered based on legal action taken by an Austrian woman employed by the Kunsthistorische Museum.