Talk:M-153 (Michigan highway)

USRD GA audit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Never sent to GAR. Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Frains Lake Road link

1. The road itself is not notable; its location isn't even that important other than being the location of a direction change in M-153's routing.
2. The linked article, Frains Lake, Michigan, has one sentence about the road. If that context is needed in this article, an appositive of "a gravel road", could be added to the sentence in this article to supply the same context. Frains Lake Road doesn't even directly connect the intersection that is the community of Frains Lake to M-153 (Ford Road).
3. Frains Lake, the community, isn't listed in the US Geological Survey's Geographic Names Information System (GNIS). A GNIS listing is pretty much a good measure of the notability of a community. Another would be a listing on the MDOT paper maps, which is absent here. Yet another potential measure of notability would the presence of a Post Office branch, current or former. Google Maps doesn't list it either. The article has been proposed, by myself, for merger into the article on Superior Township. If that merger is completed, this link would be even less appropriate, in my opinion.

Since the editor that added the link has voice an unwillingness to discuss the matter with me on his talk page, I've opened this discussion here to gain a wider opinion. I will leave the link in place for a suitable period of time for discussion. Imzadi 1979 → 06:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

I concur with the above; we don't have to have a link here. --Rschen7754 public (talk) 06:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

IKEA

My rewrite of part of the route description included a mention of IKEA's presence on M-153, which I included because the store is arguably the most major landmark in that part of the corridor, and the presence of IKEA could be seen as indicative of what a major retail area it is. The edit following mine removed it, noting it as a problem with my edit. I wanted to explain my rationale for the addition and express my hope that it will be readded in a future edit, without engaging in an edit war. 42-BRT (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

It could be seen as unduly promotional by naming a specific business, which is why I removed it. We tend not to name businesses like that in highway articles' route descriptions. Imzadi 1979 → 00:43, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

That was the least of the issues though. To wit:

• The edit split a paragraph off and disconnected the sources for the content from the content, as all of the original paragraphs, save the last one, were sourced to the same two maps.
• It was also an issue to have "M-14" randomly inserted into the middle of a sentence in the lead where it didn't belong.
• The first mention of I-275 in the RD was unlinked (and spelled out) and the second mention was linked and abbreviated .
• There was a random stray period inserted in the middle of the text.

To those were more the point of the edit summary than removing the mention of the IKEA. Imzadi 1979 → 00:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)