Talk:M-17 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
In the lead, you say "The changes made to the highways in Washtenaw County even spawned BUS M-17, a business loop for 11 years." Why is it "even"? "Even" makes it sound like this was an unusual phenomenon... And maybe say a business loop between x year and y year, rather than for 11 years.

In the Route description section, you say "West of this cloverleaf interchange, Washtenaw Avenue west of this interchange is Business Loop Interstate 94" One of these "west"s needs to be removed, I think.

In the History section, you say "US and US 112" I think there might be a number missing here.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

A couple of comments regarding prose, so I am putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting is done. Let me know if you have any other feedback. Imzadi1979 (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything else looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response! Dana boomer (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]