Talk:M-203 (Michigan highway)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- "This cancellation was reversed in late 1940." cite?
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- minor issue in 2a. --Admrboltz (talk) 04:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Reference #9 is the state map that shows 1) the redesignation/cancellation reversal and 2) the simultaneous extension north to Calumet. Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- AGF'ing. Pass --Admrboltz (talk) 04:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Reference #9 is the state map that shows 1) the redesignation/cancellation reversal and 2) the simultaneous extension north to Calumet. Imzadi1979 (talk) 04:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)