Talk:M-212 (Michigan highway)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Comments:
- Delink dates in infobox
- Do not need to indicate "none" for major intersections parameter in infobox
- Add some historical information to lead
- "there is all woodlands and residential homes" sounds awkward, rephrase
- "uneventfully" is a NPOV violation, remove
- Place last sentence of route description in preceding paragraph
- The phrase "with no alignment changes made to this date" sounds redundant
- Change "on the shores" to "along the shores"
- Clearly indicate what "they" is in follwing sentence
- If possible, get a picture of the route for the article
I am placing the article on hold Dough4872 (talk) 02:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Done.Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 11:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
@Eóin: this is the GA discussion, as you can clearly see its not competently done by current standards (this one is actually really bad, I don't think this was ever GA even in 2009... I think these guys were incompetent even by the shockingly low standards of their day) Horse Eye's Back (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)