Talk:M104 Wolverine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the M104 Wolverine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

start[edit]

Please consider this first entry a working rough draft. This is my first whole Wiki article, and I have attempted to gather the best information from multiple sources in order to make this article as accurate and concise as possible. However this is, after all, an important but relatively obscure vehicle and your information may be better than mine. --Cavgunner 09:50, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Good start I'm going to see if I can find a pic for it. Ultratone85 11:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] is the only two easily accessible (free) ones I could find, but they're not desperately good. Hmm. Shimgray | talk | 14:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know which one is the plagiarist, but [www.answers.com/topic/m104-wolverine] is word-for-word identical in some sections (it has a couple paragraphs added). GettoPhilosopher 22:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answers.com reuses Wikipedia material - it credits us somewhere on that page (at the bottom?) Shimgray | talk | 23:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nomenclature[edit]

anyone know where the army pulled this number out of their rear from? since theres already a M104 trailer. whats an M103 avlb? does the number refer to the bridge itself? or what?

M numbers are often repeated for various pieces of equipment and vehicles, however all are tracked and inventoried in the US by their unique G numbers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.43.191.1 (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]