Talk:MTL (transport company)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from MTL (transport company) was split to Merseybus on 23:37, 1 February 2024 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Merger
[edit]I suggest that the information from MTL (train operator) should be merged into MTL (transport company). This is becuase both franchises already have their own information pages, and an entirely seperate article is not needed to summarise these. There is only a small amount of relevant information, therefore it would be better for it to be placed here. Jorvik 17:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
The result was merge MTL (train operator) into this article. Jorvik 19:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on MTL (transport company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.merseytravel.gov.uk/pdf/history_Merseytravel.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930013147/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmtlgr/239/23910.htm to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmtlgr/239/23910.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Split proposed
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to split, per WP:SILENT. Hullian111 (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
I propose that the section of MTL's bus operations be split into a separate page called Merseybus. To put it simply, this article is too damn big for it's own good, and the format of the section dividing operators/operations under subheaders is really only serving to squander historical information being chronologically added about Merseybus from deregulation to eventual Arriva acquisition.
What I propose is to split the subsections 'Merseybus', 'Merseymaid', 'Merseymini' and 'Lancashire Travel' into the new article, as they are most relevant to Merseybus before the creation of MTL Trust Holdings, and maintain the other sections under the MTL article. Feedback is welcome on if more or less of the article should be split.
A lot of this article dates back to long-winded IP edits from 2006 or 2007, which carry no sources at all. Besides a split making the article less long, I reckon it would allow for the tons of writing in each section to be critically assessed and either cited or removed for lack of sourcing. Hullian111 (talk) 20:31, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Probably a good idea. Presumably you would leave a brief resume on the main page, similar to the sections on MTL London and Manchester. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh yes, absolutely, especially for how important Merseybus is to MTL's founding. Hullian111 (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- As far as I'm concerned, (I only took some pictures), go for it. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Oh yes, absolutely, especially for how important Merseybus is to MTL's founding. Hullian111 (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Merseyside articles
- Mid-importance Merseyside articles
- WikiProject Merseyside articles
- C-Class London Transport articles
- Low-importance London Transport articles
- WikiProject London Transport articles
- C-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- C-Class UK Railways articles
- Low-importance UK Railways articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages