Talk:M (James Bond)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
""once again under written, and brown is not allowed the opportunity to explore and reveal his character traits,[33] with the character being "too nice"." - is the sentence from once to traits a quote?

""Christ, I miss the Cold War")." - why a bracket?

"is a out-dated relic" - an?
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Ref 6,10,12,16,17,20,23,29,50,51,53 don't point to any citation. Overall fine.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

All the above now completed. Cheers - SchroCat (^ • @) 13:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot 50,51--♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 15:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - now done! - SchroCat (^ • @) 23:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some formatting issues

The quote box could do with aligning to either the left or right side, with the text wrapped around it.

The citation follows on directly from the preceeding text, so it has to follow and not have text wrapped around it. - SchroCat (^ • @) 00:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Schrodinger. --♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 15:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where the films are listed there is a bit white space. I would put Bernard Lee's and Judi Dench's films/games into 2 columns to remove some of this white space.

Thanks - I'll have a think about the best way to get this to look good, as well as flow properly. - SchroCat (^ • @) 00:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Mattg82. The white space is a bit distracting.--♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 15:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mattg82 (talk) 23:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All now sorted - I hope! Let me know if you would like any more changes undertaken. Cheers - SchroCat (^ • @) 23:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]