Talk:Maarten van Heemskerck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I HAVE A PAINTING THAT I ACQUIRED AT A SALE, ON THE BACK OF IT, IT SAYS, HEEMSKERK YOUNG GIRL SIZE: 15x21 BY MARTEN VAN VEEN HEEMSKERK, DUTCH SCHOOL OF PAINTING, BY HENRY HARVARD. 759.9 H38 CYCLOPEDIA OF PAINTERS AND PAINTING,BY J.D. CHAMPLIN Q75 C45 V.2 CAN YOU TELL ME ANYTHING ABOUT THIS PAINTING? THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, ERINA STURM

E-MAIL ADDRESS JEFFERY.STURM@SBCGLOBAL.NET 816-682-2347 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.245.45.50 (talkcontribs)


The text of this article is a rather quaint and gauche imitation of the florid style of those chroniclers of antiquity of all things and the arts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.197.62.99 (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hanging Gardens print said to be improperly attributed to Heemskerck[edit]

Looking at File:Hanging_Gardens_of_Babylon.jpg, the description says this is in fact believed to be a 19th-century print. Indeed, it looks off compared to the other van Heemskerck prints, which include text and a bit more flat-color stylized layers.

A Google search shows a number of such citations, until I found this grayscale, which is how the original cuts were made, I suppose. Regardless, it is very different from the one so linked. I have uploaded File:Heemskerck-hanginggardens.jpg taken from Pippin Michelli's site, but it can use additional verification from original sources. Regardless, I am replacing the currently-sourced image from this page. SamuelRiv (talk) 22:48, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. We just had a similar discussion on the Dutch wiki. See nl:Overleg:Maarten_van_Heemskerck. Yes, you're right. That is the correct version. See also http://www.geheugenvannederland.nl/?/nl/items/BVB01:BDH13285DIPK. Btw, this series has been executed by Philip Galle after drawings by Heemskerck rather than just by Heemskerck. One of these drawings has survived. See commons:File:Maarten van Heemskerck - Kolos van Rhodos - 1570 - Courtauld Gallery Londen 2-12-2009 16-56-39.JPG. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

parrot[edit]

The section about the parrots on Heemskerck's two St. Luke paintings is a bit surprising in the context of this rather short article. There doesn't seem to be the need to focus on this specific detail, as it's not of considerable importance for the artist's work in general. And the information doesn't lead to a deeper understanding of the works. I would suggest to delete this passage. NanoHeemskerck (talk) 16:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maarten van Heemskerck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]