Talk:Maass wave form
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Maass cusp form page were merged into Maass wave form on 19 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Maass wave and cusp forms[edit]
@Saraband2004: I note that you redirected the talk page from here to Talk:Maass cusp form, but my understanding is that the wave form and cusp form aren't equivalent. Rather, the cusp form is a subset of the wave form, as follows from:
- the definition at Maass wave form#Definition of a Maass wave form
- I've also taken this to WikiProject Mathematics where the response I had from "Mark viking" was that
.Maass cusp forms are wave forms that vanish at the cusps. See for instance [1], page 364
I've therefore modified the lede at Maass cusp form to reflect this, and also call into question the basis for the proposed merge of these pages; they are related but not equivalent. Klbrain (talk) 11:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Merge. Look, one is a special case of the other. Defining either requires a lot of common baggage and infrastructure to be set up. Once it's set up, then a single article can cover both: the general case, the special case. If that article gets too long, it would need to be split in three, I guess: one for the the common baggage, and then one-each for the waveform and the cusp form. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
"Maaß form" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Maaß form. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 15#Maaß form until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)