Talk:Mac Defender
![]() | A news item involving Mac Defender was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 May 2011. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Apple response
[edit]This section seems misleading and not encyclopedic. It relies on sources that can't be verified (anonymous Apple employees). Also Apple gives related information on their own pages, this should be added as a primary source: "For the protection of our customers, Apple does not disclose, discuss or confirm security issues until a full investigation has occurred and any necessary patches or releases are available." (from http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1222) Ω76 (talk) 11:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- First, the anonymous sources appear in reliable sources, who have presumably vetted the sources to ensure that they are probably reliable. Second, it would probably not be a good use of a primary source to add the source you are suggesting unless a reliable source has brought up that policy in relation to Mac Defender; without such a secondary source, this proposed addition would seem to fall squarely within WP:SYNTH territory. RJaguar3 | u | t 05:25, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
MacKeeper
[edit]Please see Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2011 May 18#Hacktool message on website. I am adding this talk page to my watchlist, and I will watch here for a reply or replies.
—Wavelength (talk) 16:24, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- I am highly dubious that all these so called Mac Keeper pop-ups are legitimate. I have about five times encountered a pop-up after using google images on my Mac which ran a fake system search window indicating that various viruses had been found on my hard drive. Of course I simply closed the browser, so I can't tell you whether it would have installed a trojan. But making false claims that viruses have been detected on your hard drive isn't advertising. It's fraud.
- I am watching for sources covering this. There are basically rumours and denials from people claiming to work for Mac Keeper on various blogs at this point. If anyone finds a relevant source he should post it. μηδείς (talk) 18:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply.
- —Wavelength (talk) 14:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism coming soon?
[edit]My first reaction as a PC user was to laugh when I saw this. Anyone think there might be some coming trolling of Mac users in this article when more people find out about this? The no viruses and malware has been a constant refrain for years after all. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 20:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- As people misunderstood why I made this topic. I am wondering if this article will be vandalised as it is on the front page and some precautionary measures should be taken.... Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 22:50, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Page protection is never used pre-emptively per policy. Being on the front page is never an acceptable argument for page protection. And most people, say, from /g/ are intelligent enough to pick the right place to troll and Wikipedia wouldn't be the right place; the proper place to troll would be macrumors.com or something, where the most butthurt would come from; even trolls should have their own standards. Those who aren't underage and pretentious know that they have nothing to gain by editing a Wikipedia article that is watched by n+1 editors where they will be swiftly reverted; I sure not everyone is stupid like that. Plus in the past 12 hours that this article has been on the front page, the vandalism count has been zero so far. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 01:49, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough, and surprising really that it's not happened. =p Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 02:26, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mac Defender. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606015001/http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/03/6780300-mac-malware-morphs-to-macshield to http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/03/6780300-mac-malware-morphs-to-macshield
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- C-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Low-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
- C-Class software articles
- Low-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles
- Mid-importance Computer Security articles
- C-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
- Computing articles needing images
- All Computer Security articles