Talk:Mad Men season 1

Mad Men season 1 was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (July 14, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Critical acclaim

You should add content from 65th Golden Globe Awards, 14th Screen Actors Guild Awards, Directors Guild of America Awards 2007 and Writers Guild of America Awards 2007 for other honors. Also mention the specific Emmy article for that year.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mad Men (season 1)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 21:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this. It may take me a few days to get to it.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the ratings content for this article?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please link notable works in the footnotes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can we get some images in this article?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LEAD

The LEAD needs to be rewritten to summarize each section of the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:14, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

What is the source for recurring cast episode counts?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

Didn't Don grow up in a whorehouse? Didn't his flashbacks depict this?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What happened to peggy's baby?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

"Joan goes out for a night out on the town with her roommate, who reveals her secret love for Joan." was this love unrequited?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some details in the Plot section are omitted from the episode details. E.g., in which episode do Don get his pass from Bert Cooper on his fake ID?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crew

"who directs each season finale" needs a citation.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

Is there a link for Metacritic?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Which The New York Times critic made this statement? Same for Variety?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Make sure all critics with WP articles are linked.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please link Eisenhower and Sopranos.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please incorporate the Top Ten Lists.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accolades

Link to all specific awards won (Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Main Title Design, Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Cinematography for a One Hour Series).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If I am counting correctly you only account for 11 of the 15 emmy nominations.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Try to link to the specific award year if possible (for List of Peabody Award winners (2000–2009) pipe it to the proper section).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am putting this on hold. Please respond to each concern individually by indenting responses in the following line. I will check back on this article in a week.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have just noticed that GAs like Grey's Anatomy (season 2), Fringe (season 2) and Sanctuary (season 2) put all plot content in the episode pararaphs in the table. Why don't you make sure all your plot content is in the episode paragraphs and remove it as redundant except for a summary LEAD paragraph.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I gave the nominator a nudge on 19:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC) and just gave a second reminder.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have interacted with the nominator of this work and am confident that the concerns would be addressed if the nominator was active. However, the nominator has not been active for weeks. Thus, I am failing this article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone thought about looking into the gender and politics of Man Men? Would it be appropriate to link something like that on this page? There are so many interesting avenues to the show it would be a shame not to explore such a major caveat of the show on this page. Let me know! Cagrubba (talk) 23:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mad Men (season 1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mad Men (season 1). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]