Talk:Magnetophon

Professional sound production High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Allies knowledge of wartime Magnetophon[edit]

This sentence has been flagged as dubious: 'Allied intelligence experts knew that the Germans had some new form of recording system but they did not know the details'

The BBC were aware of the Magnetophon before the war: Edward Pawley was able to examine one.It was still in its early stages - for one thing the tape frequently broke - but it was considered that it might eventually become useful.

During the war the Germans discovered that high-frequency bias would improve the quality considerably, and the brittle cellulose acetate tape was replaced by PVC (poly vinyl chloride). The use the Germans were making of the Magnetophon was known from an article entitled 'Radio changed over to magnetic steel tape' wqhich appeared in 'Das Reich' at the end of 1944. However it was not until the invasion and the capture of some machines that the reasons for the improvement in recorded quality which had become apparent from Hitler's broadcast speeches was known.

Information from 'BBC Engineering 1922-1972' by Edward Pawley, page 387.

Is it felt we need that much clarification in the article? I've added a brief parenthetical clarification with a reference. RFWilmut (talk) 16:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think the article needs further clarification. The BBC had been experimenting with steel wire and later flat steel tape themselves since the early 1930's and would have had some knowledge of German pre-war developments through trade shows and general contacts among the engineering community in their respective countries. Yes the Allies were confounded by how the Germans were able to achieve such good results with programme material known to have been recorded. But some accounts exaggerate their degree of ignorance about German technical developments. They were well aware of magnetic recording and probably suspected the Germans were using some improved type of magnetic recording process but just hadn't figured out how they achieved such improvements. BTW Some Wikipedia articles #1 #2 give different dates for the date for discovery of HF bias while this one says 1941.94.0.215.193 (talk) 13:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magnetophon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130208162634/http://mixonline.com/TECnology-Hall-of-Fame/aeg-magnetophone-recorder-090106/ to http://mixonline.com/TECnology-Hall-of-Fame/aeg-magnetophone-recorder-090106/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

The article fails to mention one thing: what tape speed(s) did those early Magnetophons use??? Lee M (talk) 00:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huge! It was so fast, and such a mechanical problem, that they tended to run at variable speeds. You'd trade off sound quality for reliability. The RAF wire recorders used for ELINT flights in the 1950s had a real problem with this, recording long surveillance runs where much of the flight was unimportant, then there was a brief interval of great interest – but there was probably only a few seconds of radar worth listening to, and the broadcast was only recorded once.

Actual speeds were five or six times later tape speeds. As a round number, 100 cm/s (that's a whole metre!), was one. Andy Dingley (talk)

Well, actually 100 cm/s is only about 2.6 times faster than 38 cm/s (15 ips), which is the industry standard, and only 30% faster than 76 cm/s (30 ips), sometimes used for higher quality, so... Lee M (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]