Talk:Mahler on the Couch

This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request on the basis that: "It is a film" plus the title is sufficient cotext, a web search easily returns more info. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits.

Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely.

DES ^(talk) 18:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC) [reply]

A fact from Mahler on the Couch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the film Mahler on the Couch deals with a love triangle between Alma Mahler, Walter Gropius, and Gustav Mahler, and Gustav's consultation with Sigmund Freud?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mahler on the Couch.

Wikipedia

Citation style[edit]

This article curently uses CS1 citations implemented via citation templates. Moreover, it uses list directed references. Together, these make up a consistant style of citation and referencing. As per WP:CITEVAR, this style should not be changed unless consensus to make a change is first formed on this talk page, or in some other appropriate on-wiki location. DES ^(talk) 05:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Linking in quotes[edit]

According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Linking (a sub-section of MOS:QUOTE): "As much as possible, avoid linking from within quotes, which may clutter the quotation, violate the principle of leaving quotations unchanged, and mislead or confuse the reader." I am therefore about to repeat this edit. Please don't reinsert the link in the quotation without discussing further, and preferably obtaining consensus, here. DES ^(talk) 21:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]