Talk:Makinti Napanangka/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Start review. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment

1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

   • 

2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

   • 

3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

   • 

4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.

   • 

5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

   • 

No problems found when checking against quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • I made a few minor copy-edits. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • No dead links. All good as far as I can ascertain. Assume Good faith for print sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   • Pity no actually examples can be found for thsi artcile. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • I have no hesitation in passing thsi artcile to GA status. It would be good to search for suitable fair use imagery. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)