This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Malati Rishidev is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
Deletion objection. The reason provided for deletion is not strong enough. The nominator's reason is "She doesn't even break Khagendra Thapa Magar's record. And there's Prakash Sardar with a better claim". . Khagendra Thapa Magar, a male, is already dead, he is no more the record holder. Malati is a women record holder and still alive. nirmal (talk) 10:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
When the discussion is over, it will be archived here. Rastinition (talk) 04:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rastinition: Its nice that you are super active. 4R is a good thumb rule and I have no problem with it. But, while you edit articles, i suggest you to read the article and references before making changes. The references at top may be used to make a point in other part of the same article. Some editor do not realize this and put "missing citation tags". In the case of this article, you surely realized the mistake, then added the referenes back at proper place. I suggest you to cool down, take a sip of beer and think twice before removing the referenes and editing the exitisting artciles. Also, I noted from your editiong history that you are diliberately removing chinese refernces resoning 4R everywhere. I am not sure what you are upto, but note that you may be blocked from editing in future if you diliberately remove selected references. I think you are well aware of WP:POV. Best regards! nirmal (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- also if you have plan to edit Nepal related projects, you may refer here for reliable references in Nepalese media. Best! nirmal (talk) 09:27, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
After seeing your reply, I found that you can understand what I said, and you know that I try to improve (if I have time). If you're in doubt about removing references, I'd say I know that unreliable sources increase unreliable results, so I don't want the wiki to be unreliable.While some content farms are true, not all of them are. And they will copy each other.If we check whether the content farm content is real every time, it will increase the trouble for editors and readers, it is not good for us.Rastinition (talk) 09:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also I would like to add. References are also not recommended to use multiple sources of the same or similar content if they are from a reliable source.The reader will find that he wastes a lot of time reading the same content. That's how I felt a little earlier because I was reading at that time.--Rastinition (talk) 09:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wait! How long did I spend today on the wiki? It seems almost 11 hours, no wonder I feel sleepy... --Rastinition (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
