Talk:Malati Shendge

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

India: Maharashtra / Education / History / Women & gender Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.
	This article is supported by the Indian women and gender issues workgroup.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does[edit]

she pass WP:N? ∯WBG^converse 18:14, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

'Fringe theory'[edit]

I think that if Shendge is going to be called a 'fringe theorist' there needs to be a source for that specific identification, given that it is a somewhat prejudicial or pejorative description. I don't think that any of her reviewers call her that, though they do acknowledge that her theory is at odds with the conventional approach to the Indus scripts. I don't think that there are any decipherment or identification claims that have widespread support, so what is fringe and what isn't is a bit of an open question. --Spasemunki (talk) 08:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]