Jump to content

Talk:Malliswari (1951 film)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right on topic, haven't long finished watching it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

""made a cute on-screen pair" -according to whom? Well?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already it's written, "Narasimha Reddy said that Rama Rao and Bhanumathi "made a cute on-screen pair", adding that one cannot imagine anyone else as Nagaraju and Malleswari". Kailash29792 (talk) 12:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Or else Doctor, shall i remove the inverted commas there? I don't think so that removing them would make any difference. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, I think the quotes can stay as there is no formal/neutral synonym for "cute". Kailash29792 (talk) 14:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How about a good on-screen pair? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Dr. Blofeld 14:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks to be of sound quality and well documented given the period. Nicely done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Dr. Blofeld! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 17:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]